We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies



Forgotten password?


Dear readers,

our online journals are moving. The new (and old) issues of all journals can be found at
In most cases you can log in there directly with your e-mail address and your current password. Otherwise we ask you to register again. Thank you very much.

Your Quintessence Publishing House
ENDO 14 (2020), No. 1     17. Mar. 2020
ENDO 14 (2020), No. 1  (17.03.2020)

Page 53-61

Fracture resistance of teeth with direct composite restorations reflecting different restorative designs in fractured root canal treated anterior teeth: an in-vitro study
Subashri, Vishanth / Sherwood, Anand / Samran, Abdulaziz / Gutmann, James L. / Subramani, Savadamoorthi Kamatchi
Objective: Restoration of fractured root canal-treated maxillary incisors based on recent advances in adhesive dentistry and minimal invasive principles, which are topics of great importance. In particular, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of a corono-radicular direct composite restoration compared with fibre post composite restorations and direct conventional composite restorations.
Materials and methods: A total of 45 freshly extracted sound maxillary central incisors were used in the study. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 15 each. The groups were: group I (CDC), conventional direct composite postendodontic restoration; group II (FPC), fibre post placement and direct composite postendodontic restoration; group III (CRC), corono-radicular composite postendodontic restoration. The fracture resistance was measured using a universal testing machine and a 130 degrees angle of loading.
Results: One-way ANOVA depicted a significant difference (P = 0.028) among the three groups with the mean fracture load of group CRC being the highest, at 1045.2 ± 355.7 N. The FPC group had the significantly least fracture resistance load, with 426.7 ± 245.3 N.
Conclusions: Within the parameters of this study, the corono-radicular composite restorations had significantly higher fracture resistance than conventional direct composite and fibre post restorations when 50% of the crown structure was lost in fractured root canal-treated maxillary incisors.

Keywords: coronal restoration, glass fibre post, monoblock effect, monolithic restoration, root canal treated teeth
fulltext (no access granted) Endnote-Export